User Tools

Site Tools


decade_boxes

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
decade_boxes [2026/08/29 20:41] – Testing summary sdh7decade_boxes [2026/08/29 21:32] (current) – Link to Nuts & Volts article, updates sdh7
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 These have all been briefly tested, and seem to have decent precision. I didn't look under the hood to see if they're 1% components, but the values tested were pretty good. These have all been briefly tested, and seem to have decent precision. I didn't look under the hood to see if they're 1% components, but the values tested were pretty good.
 +
 +These are also documented in this article: https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/September2016_Capacitor-Resistor-Substitution-Boxes, and were acquired from the estate of the author.
  
 {{ :0:hipower_decade.png?400 |}} {{ :0:hipower_decade.png?400 |}}
-One homemade-looking "high power" resistance decade box, described as "20 Watts per decade". Adjustable from 1 ohm to 10K. Resistors probably are not super precise (maybe 10% tolerance?). Measurements on low resistances are especially inaccurate.+One homemade-looking "high power" resistance decade box, described as "20 Watts per decade". Adjustable from 1 ohm to 10K. Resistors probably are not super precise (maybe 10% tolerance?). Measurements on low resistances are somewhat inaccurate. Also came from the Robert Reed estate, but not pictured in the article.
  
  
decade_boxes.txt · Last modified: by sdh7